Christian History, Spring 1998
In 1911 as William Durham denounced the
"second blessing" doctrine of sanctification, a young woman
attacked him with her hat pin to register her "pointed
opposition." She was not alone in her contempt for his
"demonic" views. The conflict over sanctification had burst
forth a year earlier and had became the first full-blown
controversy of the Pentecostal movement.
The early Pentecostal movement arose from the
Holiness movement, and like its parent, shared John Wesley's
views on sanctification: that it was an instantaneous
experience of "entire sanctification" or "Christian
perfection" and that it was a separate experience from
conversion. Early Pentecostals called it a "second blessing"
and regarded it as a necessary preparation for a third
experience, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (that is, the
new Pentecostal experience).
In 1910, William H. Durham, pastor of the
North Avenue Mission in Chicago, began making waves throughout
Pentecostal circles when he denounced these views. "I began to
write against the doctrine that it takes two works of grace to
save and cleanse a man," he later wrote. "I denied and still
deny that God does not deal with the nature of sin at
conversion. I deny that a man who is converted or born again
is outwardly washed and cleansed but that his heart is left
unclean with enmity against God in it."
This wouldn't be salvation, he argued,
because salvation "means that all the old man, or old nature,
which was sinful and depraved and which was the very thing in
us that was condemned, is crucified with Christ." He dubbed
his position the "finished work at Calvary" because he
believed the work of Christ on the cross was sufficient for
both salvation and sanctification. Finished-work Pentecostals
slowly also came to stress a gradual process of
sanctification, not an instantaneous one, in which the
sanctifying work of Christ was "appropriated" over one's
life.
Locked out of
Azusa
Durham returned to the Azusa Mission in 1911
(where he had received the gift of tongues in 1906). William
Seymour was on a preaching tour, and Durham was invited to
preach. His finished-work teaching generated conflict but
sparked a fresh revival. Wrote one observer, "The fire began
to fall at old Azusa as at the beginning." But when Seymour
heard what was going on, he promptly returned and padlocked
the church door to prevent the Chicago preacher from speaking
further in his pulpit. Undaunted, Durham moved to a rival
mission and continued proclaiming his message.
From his home in Kansas, Charles Parham (by
then dropping rapidly out of the Pentecostal spotlight)
declared, "If this man's doctrine is true, let my life go out
to prove it, but if our teaching on a definite grace of
sanctification is true, let his life pay the forfeit." When
Durham passed away unexpectedly later that year, Parham
claimed vindication and remarked to his followers "how
signally God has answered."
Despite such ardent denunciation, Durham's
interpretation emerged as the preferred theological position
for roughly half of all Pentecostals by 1915. Most of the
denominations formed as Holiness bodies prior to the
Pentecostal outpouring remained staunch supporters of the
second-blessing doctrine, while newer organizations, including
the Assemblies of God, either left the matter open to
individuals or adopted the finished-work view. It is today the
view of most American Pentecostals.
James R. Goff, Jr., is professor of
history at Appalachian State University in Boone, North
Carolina.
More resources:
James R. Goff, Jr., is the author of Fields
White Unto Harvest: Charles F. Parham and the Missionary
Origins of Pentecostalism. It's one of the best books
on how Pentecostalism came to be, seen through the life of
Parham, a true Sphinx.
Though there are no major books solely about
the William Durham or the finished-work controversy, both
stories are told in depth in the Dictionary
of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, edited by
Stanley M. Burgess and Gary B. McGee.
Copyright © 1998 by the author or Christianity
Today International/Christian History magazine.
Click
here for reprint information on Christian
History.
Spring 1998, Vol. XVII, No.
2, Page 18